A good Logico-Linguistic Query Into Fundamentals out of Physics: Part We

Nonetheless, they remains accessible to the way the reader means it work, which is the substance out of emptiness

Scientific research, try out procedures, efficiency and you can interpretations is devised on the notice, and additionally creativity and you can term and design coding. The proper reporting of efficiency is even critical. Particularly in theoretical physics, linguistic experience and you will carefulness whenever you are writing are receiving a far more clicking you need within the the brand new subjects from the horizons out of established degree. Discover individuals from most other industries who are willing to get me wrong and you will spark too many discourses/conclusions; they develop courses regarding a few bytes of information including « yes/no/maybe »; therefore, nonscience or occult misinformation is offered, examples of and this abound in the industries regarding unique relativity principle and you can quantum physics. Ergo, science should not make use of the phrases you to definitely served brand new Paleolithic attention. Category: Standard Technology and you will Thinking

Trappist-step 1 Celebrity Program

The fresh new James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) will soon transcend what the Hubble has been capable talk about. Certainly the very first plans shall be the new TRAPPIST-step 1 star system inside Aquarius. It essay examines why you to puny red dwarf is indeed fascinating, and exactly why the fresh new hunt for alien lifestyle forms age. Category: General Technology and you will Values

Physical dimensions like « mass », « length », « charge », represented by the symbols $[M], [L], [Q]$, are <\it>, but used as <\it>to perform dimensional analysis in particular, and to write the equations of physics in general, by the physicist. The law of excluded middle falls short of explaining the contradictory meanings of the same symbols. The statements like « $m\to 0$ », « $r\to 0$ », « $q\to 0$ », used by the physicist, are inconsistent on dimensional grounds because « $ m$ », « $r$ », « $q$ » represent <\it>with physical dimensions of $[M], [L], [Q]$ respectively and « $0$ » represents just a number — devoid of physical dimension. Consequently, the involvement of the statement « $\lim_$, where $q$ is the test charge » in the definition of electric field, leads to either circular reasoning or a contradiction regarding the experimental verification of the smallest charge in the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. Considering such issues as problematic, by choice, I make an inquiry regarding the basic language in terms of which physics is written, with an aim of exploring how truthfully the verbal statements can be converted to the corresponding physico-mathematical expressions, where « physico-mathematical » signifies the involvement of physical dimensions. Such investigation necessitates an explanation by demonstration of « self inquiry », « middle way », « dependent origination », « emptiness/relational existence », which are certain terms that signify the basic tenets of Buddhism. In light of such demonstration I explain my view of « definition »; the https://datingranking.net/dating-over-60/ relations among quantity, physical dimension and number; meaninglessness of « zero quantity » and the associated logico-linguistic fallacy; difference between unit and unity. Considering the importance of the notion of electric field in physics, I present a critical analysis of the definitions of electric field due to Maxwell and Jackson, along with the physico-mathematical conversions of the verbal statements. The analysis of Jackson’s definition points towards an expression of the electric field as an infinite series due to the associated « limiting process » of the test charge. However, it brings out the necessity of a postulate regarding the existence of charges, which nevertheless follows from the definition of quantity. Consequently, I explain the notion of <\it>that act as the middle way to resolve the contradiction regarding the Millikan-Fletcher oil drop experiment. In passing, I provide a logico-linguistic analysis, in physico-mathematical terms, of two verbal statements of Maxwell in relation to his definition of electric field, which suggests Maxwell’s conception of dependent origination of distance and charge (i.e. $[L]\equiv[Q]$) and that of emptiness in the context of relative vacuum (in contrast to modern absolute vacuum). This work is an appeal for the dissociation of the categorical disciplines of logic and physics and on the large, a fruitful merger of Eastern philosophy and Western science. Category: General Science and Philosophy